data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33085/330859869e541b0640e9c99e089caf15f8639fe0" alt="Cpu benchmark intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a3fc/3a3fcf456e86ee3488795cb69b921ab96e83cbd0" alt="cpu benchmark intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz cpu benchmark intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz"
Incase you are wondering why I placed the Macbook and Macbook Pro at the same speed, please note that Core 2 has an advantage of 20% over Core 1 clock 4 clock not to mention the advantage of having double the L2 cache. Macbook Pro / Core 2 Duo(merom) 2.1-2.33 4MB L2 iMac will use Merom as it is already pin compatible with the current Core duo mobile chips. You really think apple is gonna put is gonna put 2 $80 cpu's in a prosumer machine.not. Hate to break It to you but the dual socket days are over for Desktop macs. Conroe will do just fine and from most benchmarks it out performs the Athlon X2 by atleast 20% clock 4 clock.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fd05/4fd05e136de09ef8d96cd1bd20bd3995f8279beb" alt="cpu benchmark intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz cpu benchmark intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz"
Woodcrest is not nor will it ever see daylight in a power mac/Mac Pro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33085/330859869e541b0640e9c99e089caf15f8639fe0" alt="Cpu benchmark intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz"